Recomendations for AP

[d.g.luechtefeld at mac.com]

Real world usage, Ken. Real world. Very, very few environments will see someone bother to run WEPCrack on a voice stream. 

The original poster expressed concerns about price and availability differential between WEP and WPA2 handsets. For a budget-constrained environment that needs the equipment soon WEP might be just fine.

d
 
On Friday, February 24, 2006, at 05:37PM, Ken <ken at ipl31.net> wrote:

>On 2/24/06, d.g.luechtefeld at mac.com <d.g.luechtefeld at mac.com> wrote:
>> WEP's weaknesses are well known but for voice applications it's probably still provides sufficient confidentiality in most environments.
>
>If sufficent confidentiality is no confidentiality then yes I would agree.
>
>-Ken
>
>>
>> On Friday, February 24, 2006, at 05:03PM, Dimitris Kogias <dimitris at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Dejan Nikic wrote:
>> >> hmm the proxim AP4000 looks good, but it seems a bit hard to find on the
>> >> net.  I found only one place for $380, which is a good price.  Any tips
>> >> on the security setup of these. The phones we're trying to use should
>> >> support WEP, do you think this is sufficient?
>> >
>> >WEP is broken, so if you care about security you need either phones that
>> >can do WPA/WPA2 (preferably with AES support) or phones where the VoIP
>> >application protocol itself is secure (secure SIP and SRTP for example).
>> >
>> >I'm aware of wired (ethernet) SIP phones that implement this, but not
>> >sure about WiFi phones.
>> >
>> >D.
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Talk mailing list
>> >Talk at seattlewireless.net
>> >http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk mailing list
>> Talk at seattlewireless.net
>> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>
>
>
>--
>Ken Caruso
>ken at ipl31.net
>_______________________________________________
>Talk mailing list
>Talk at seattlewireless.net
>http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>