Recomendations for AP

[Todd Boyle]

 >> WEP's weaknesses are well known

Is the security on 900mhz or 2.4gz cordless phones much better?

98% of the things people say are SPAM anyways, pushing one thing
or another.  Nobody even opens their mouth, without a reason.
Don't we want people to be listening?  Let 'em listen.
On the other hand, we need to listen in on these guys,
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Brian+L.+Roberts%22+Notebaert&num=30
Strong privacy serves only the powerful.  Privacy doesn't serve most 
peoples' best interest.
The Repubs are on Bushs' case over the NSA.  Gee I wonder why.

Todd

At 05:50 PM 2/24/2006, d.g.luechtefeld at mac.com wrote:
>Real world usage, Ken. Real world. Very, very few environments will see 
>someone bother to run WEPCrack on a voice stream.
>
> >On 2/24/06, d.g.luechtefeld at mac.com <d.g.luechtefeld at mac.com> wrote:
> >> WEP's weaknesses are well known but for voice applications it's 
> probably still provides sufficient confidentiality in most environments.
> >
> >If sufficent confidentiality is no confidentiality then yes I would agree.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.seattlewireless.net/pipermail/talk/attachments/20060225/d10c45fa/attachment.html