BiQuad antenna question
Rastislav Galia
rasto at inprop.sk
Tue Feb 20 23:53:35 PST 2007
gary wrote / napísal(a):
> It would help to have the link to the antenna design.
>
> I'm going to upload a photo tonight of a biquad I built that is a bit
> easier to build than most of the designs on the net. Basically, all I
> did was use round loop at 3x the wavelength rather than squares that are
> a wavelength on each side.
>
> IMHO, you need to build these antennas using a connector on the back,
> not coax. This is because you need a rigid "pipe" on the antenna to feed
> the loops.
>
> This is the "proper" biquad design in that is uses a coax feed to the loop:
> http://martybugs.net/wireless/biquad/
> Mine is similar except I use a N female to N female adapter with one of
> the N connectors hacksawed off as the basic feed. This bypasses the
> copper pipe deal. And as I stated earlier, it uses loops instead of squares.
>
Hi Gary
thank you for your answer. Yes, martybugs' desing was the one I was
refering to. My idea is to use coax like 2 meters long, insert it into
martybugs' copper pipe concept. That would make it as rigid as
martybugs' 40 centimeter long coax terminated by N connector. As far as
I understood you, your "rigid pipe" concerns were of mechanical
durability nature, whereas my question was rather about highfrequency
impedantial properties of N connector. In the other words, is it
neccessary to use N connector under the assumption that I would make my
long coax rigidly fixed (for example using the copper pipe) ?
-Rasto
More information about the Talk
mailing list